Growing businesses often default to one of three dysfunctional management systems: the septic tank, the mushroom, or the seagull. Monaghan argues that clear authority, visible information, accountability, predictable cadence and management by exception are what allow a company to operate without constant founder intervention.
Built to Run Without You | Newsletter 12
There are three management systems I keep coming across in growing businesses.
The septic tank.
The mushroom.
And the seagull.
You will never see any of them on an organisation chart.
Nobody deliberately introduces them.
Nobody puts them into the company handbook.
But spend enough time inside founder-led businesses and you quickly recognise them.
And all three usually point to the same underlying problem:
The business is still being managed through the behaviour of the owner rather than through a proper management system.
A company can have managers, meetings, reports, job titles, KPIs and an organisation chart and still not really have a management system.
A proper management system tells people:
Without that, the organisation eventually defaults to one of three systems.
All the big problems float to the top.
Something happens in operations.
It goes to the supervisor.
Then the manager.
Then the director.
And eventually it lands on the CEO’s desk.
The bigger the problem, the faster it rises.
A customer is unhappy.
Ask the boss.
A supplier misses a delivery.
Ask the boss.
Someone wants to give a discount.
Ask the boss.
A new employee needs to be recruited.
Ask the boss.
A machine needs replacing.
Ask the boss.
Before long, the founder is making dozens of decisions every week that should never have reached them.
Initially, this can feel like control.
It isn’t.
It is dependency.
And dependency gets increasingly expensive as a business grows.
Decisions slow down.
Managers hesitate.
People become afraid of making the wrong call.
Eventually, perfectly capable managers stop using their judgement because the safest answer is always:
“Ask the boss.”
Then the CEO walks into the management meeting and asks:
“Why can nobody make a decision around here?”
Usually because the business has spent years teaching them not to.
If every problem floats to you, you are not controlling the business.
You have become the filter through which the entire business must pass.
That might work when there are 10 or 20 employees.
The owner can still hold most of the important information in their head.
But add 100 employees, several locations, more customers, more suppliers and hundreds of daily decisions and the system starts to break.
Eventually every growing company has to make one very important transition:
From the owner managing the business to the management system managing the business.
The mushroom management system is slightly different.
Keep people in the dark, feed them plenty of manure and then wonder why they don’t grow.
The founder tells managers:
“I need you to take more ownership.”
“Think like an owner.”
“Be more commercial.”
“Make decisions.”
Sounds reasonable.
Except the same managers often cannot see the information the owner uses to make those decisions.
They do not understand the strategy.
They do not see the financial position.
They cannot see customer profitability.
They do not know which priorities genuinely matter.
They do not know what the company can afford.
They do not know where they have authority.
Then they are told to take ownership.
That is not empowerment.
That is guesswork with a job title.
You cannot ask a sales director to improve profitability without showing them gross margin.
You cannot ask an operations manager to improve productivity without agreeing what good productivity looks like.
You cannot ask managers to deliver a strategy they have never been shown.
And you cannot ask people to behave like owners while withholding the information owners use to make decisions.
A good management system makes the important information visible.
Managers should understand:
They do not need access to every confidential piece of information in the business.
But they need enough information to make good decisions.
When information is scarce, something else fills the gap.
Rumour.
Politics.
Guesswork.
Departments start protecting themselves.
People spend their time trying to work out what the founder really wants rather than doing the work.
You cannot demand ownership from people you keep guessing.
Then there is the seagull.
Fly in. Make a lot of noise. Drop a load of new priorities. Fly out.
This usually happens when the founder is spending more time away from the day-to-day operation.
Maybe they are working on a major customer.
An acquisition.
A new site.
A new product.
Another business.
The management team runs the company for a few weeks.
Then the founder arrives.
Within two hours they notice five things they do not like.
The warehouse is untidy.
A report is formatted incorrectly.
A project is late.
Someone hired the wrong person.
A customer complaint has not been handled properly.
Suddenly fifteen new priorities appear.
Meetings are called.
Instructions are issued.
Projects change direction.
The existing plan quietly disappears.
Everyone starts chasing the latest instructions.
And then the founder disappears again.
Three weeks later the seagull returns.
Another set of observations.
Another collection of priorities.
Another change of direction.
Eventually the management team learns something very dangerous:
Do not take today’s priority too seriously because there may be another one next Tuesday.
People stop trusting the plan.
Projects stall.
Initiative falls.
Managers begin waiting.
The organisation becomes reactive because direction depends on when the owner happens to land.
The problem isn’t that founders have ideas.
Founders should have ideas.
Many of the best ideas in the company will still come from the founder.
The problem is turning every idea into an immediate operational priority.
An idea needs to be tested.
Ranked.
Resourced.
Assigned.
And considered alongside everything the company is already trying to do.
An idea is not a priority just because the owner had it on Tuesday.
The septic tank, mushroom and seagull systems look very different.
But they have the same root cause.
The company is being managed through the habits and interventions of the owner rather than through a defined management system.
That creates founder dependency.
And eventually one of three things happens.
The founder becomes exhausted.
The business stops growing.
Or the organisation grows beyond the founder’s personal ability to manage it.
Sometimes all three happen together.
This is why management systems matter.
They are not bureaucracy.
They are not about endless reports, committees or meetings.
Done properly, a management system is the infrastructure that allows good people to make good decisions without constantly returning to the founder for permission.
Way to go but takes effort
It does not need to be complicated.
In fact, the best systems usually make seven things very clear.
Who owns what?
People should understand where responsibility sits and who ultimately carries the result.
What can people decide?
Good delegation is not telling someone they are responsible and then requiring your approval for every meaningful decision.
Managers need clear authority limits.
How do we know whether we are winning?
A handful of meaningful KPIs is far more useful than a 50-page management report nobody acts upon.
Numbers should trigger action.
When do we stop and review the business?
Weekly operational decisions.
Monthly business performance.
Quarterly strategy and priorities.
The rhythm should be predictable.
Who is doing what by when?
One owner.
One deadline.
One follow-up.
How do we stop critical knowledge living inside someone’s head?
The important processes in a company need to become repeatable.
That is how businesses scale.
What genuinely needs the CEO?
Normal business should stay with management.
Exceptional decisions should rise.
That is very different from every decision rising.
Notice what is missing from that list.
More CEO approval.
The objective is not to remove the CEO from the company.
It is to remove the CEO from normal work that capable managers should already own.
There is a very simple way to find out whether you really have a management system.
Imagine you disappear tomorrow for four weeks.
No phone calls.
No email.
No WhatsApp.
No checking the numbers from the beach.
Nothing.
What happens?
Do the management meetings continue?
Do people still review the numbers?
Do customer problems get resolved?
Do managers make decisions?
Do projects keep moving?
Does recruitment continue?
Does cash remain under control?
Do priorities remain the same?
Or does the organisation slowly accumulate problems and decisions waiting for you to return?
That answer tells you far more about the strength of your business than any organisation chart.
Because the real test isn’t whether the company performs when you are there.
The real test is whether it performs when you are not.
If you cannot switch off for four weeks, the business is not yet independent of you.
It is simply waiting for you.
Most founders believe the next stage of growth requires them to work harder.
Usually it requires something different.
Clearer authority.
Better information.
Stronger accountability.
A predictable management rhythm.
And the discipline to stop personally solving every problem.
The objective is not to create a company where nothing ever goes wrong.
That company does not exist.
The objective is to create a company where the right problems are solved by the right people, at the right level, without every road eventually leading back to the CEO.
Because if every major problem eventually floats to you, you don’t have a management system.
You have a septic tank.
And you should not be sitting on top of it.
Which management system has quietly crept into your business?
The septic tank, the mushroom or the seagull?
Put This Into Practice
The CEO Scorecard gives you a clear view of the constraints affecting profit, cash, the team and your time.
Continue Reading
Back to all articles